After the end of the Cold War – in January of 1993 – the Barents cooperation came to life through the signing of the Kirkenes Declaration. Trust and stability were to be developed through this new framework for cooperation between states, regional units, and people – primarily in the northern parts of Russia, Norway, Finland and Sweden.

Three decades later – with Russia's hot war against its neighboring country and harsh measures against its domestic civil society – questions are being raised about what successes the cooperation can actually claim and even the framework's right to life.

On Wednesday the 11th of January, 30 years of cooperation in the Barents Euro-Arctic Region will be recognized in Kirkenes, the Norwegian town on the border to Russia, with questions about what has been and what can be.

At the Transborder Cafè, Pikene på Broen (a collective of curators and producers) and the Norwegian Barents Secretariat invite to lectures and panel discussions with voices from the four mentioned Barents countries.

"We have chosen to mark the 30 years that have passed since the signing of the Kirkenes Declaration to go a bit deeper into which political tendencies made it possible and what interest it got both nationally and regionally in Norway," says Marit Jacobsen, Deputy Head of the Norwegian Barents Secretariat, to High North News.

'Architects', researchers, and enthusiasts

"We have invited people who were involved in the work before the signing and who have researched Norwegian-Russian cooperation in the North in the entire period. We also want to highlight representatives for what we call the Barents generation – individuals and enthusiasts who have participated in the cooperation's "la belle èpoque", she continues.

At the event, they will present their views on the cooperation results, the Ukraine War's effects on the border-crossing interaction, possible moves for rebuilding trust, and how the Barents region may look in five, ten, and thirty new years.

"We know that the Barents model has been of great interest to other border areas in Europe. We may resume cooperation with Russia again at some point in the future and it is therefore important to summarize what the prerequisites were for it to work and which mechanisms contributed to this," Jacobsen points out.

Signals from Norway's government

The Barents cooperation's activities which involve public Russian institutions were suspended two weeks after the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

As the war prolonged, the aforementioned debate about the credentials and the future of this cooperation framework with the Russian side flourished. In the past, the prevailing opinion was that the Barents cooperation – with dialogue and work for sustainable development between states, regional units, and people – constitutes an international success story.

An example is that on the 20th anniversary in 2013, the member states confirmed their commitment to the Kirkenes Declaration by adopting a new declaration in Kirkenes. In this, they refer to "significant results" and point to the Barents cooperation as a model for others to follow.

Engaging Russia in the Barents cooperation was worth a try, even though the efforts did not lead to a present, democratic, and peaceful neighboring country, stated Norwegian MFA Anniken Huitfeld (Labor) in a speech this fall.

In its proposal for the state budget for 2023, the Norwegian government states that "it is important for Norway and Norwegian interests that we maintain international cooperation fora in the North" – and that it supports the continuation of activities in the Barents Euro-Arctic Council and the Arctic Council without Russia, as long as it serves the purposes.

Preservation as a keyword

The mentioned councils are referred to by the government as significant over time for trust-building dialogue and project cooperation in the north, but also as areas for cooperation where the war has an impact. At the same time, it is emphasized that such structures that have been built over several decades must be maintained.

The following is also pointed out: "Russia is not excluded from the Arctic Council, the Barents Euro-Arctic Council, or the EU's Northern Dimension, and will be able to re-enter the cooperation if the situation changes."

At the same time, the possibility is discussed that the current aggressive and authoritarian features of Russian foreign- and domestic policies may be long-lasting. Nevertheless, it is also in Norway's interest to preserve areas of expertise on Russia within public management, academia, and civil society, the government believes – and it is obvious that it has the Norwegian Barents Secretariat in mind, i.a.

It is also relevant for the people-to-people aspect and the secretariat's work that the government will "continue to support civil society actors, human rights activists, and the free media in Russia, to the extent possible, and in exile." The financing of such measures has been added to a new grant scheme within foreign affairs called "Russia".

Also read

This article was originally published in Norwegian and has been translated by Birgitte Annie Molid Martinussen.